Figma vs Vibe.WithGov
Figma is for wireframes; Vibe is for working prototypes. Most government service teams need both, not one or the other.
- Updated
- 16 May 2026
- 6 min read
Figma is the canvas where most UK government service teams sketch journeys and run critique sessions. It excels at the early-shaping work: trying layouts, comparing directions, getting the team to a shared design before writing a line of code. Vibe.WithGov is for the next step: generating a working GOV.UK Prototype Kit project from the spec, so research participants can use a prototype that behaves like the real service.
The honest framing: these tools do different jobs. Most teams need both, used at different points in the sprint. The matrix below is for the moments when they overlap.
The matrix
Vibe.WithGov
AI generates a working Prototype Kit project from a plain-English spec.
Figma
A collaborative design canvas with the GOV.UK Design System library.
Artefact you ship to research
Real form behaviour
Figma can simulate clicks between frames but not real form input or validation.
Keyboard navigation that mirrors a real service
GOV.UK Frontend (the real CSS + JS)
Figma uses static design-system components; Vibe uses the published Frontend that production services run on.
Authoring surface
Best for early shaping
Figma is unbeatable for sketching the journey, exploring layout, and team critique.
Best for research-ready prototypes
Iteration speed within a sprint
WCAG 2.1 AA on first paint
Figma wireframes are visual mocks; they have no accessibility tree to assess.
Keyboard and screen-reader testable
Useful evidence for an assessment panel
Shareable URL for research participants
Participants type into the prototype
Hand to engineering as build spec
Pricing model
Useful for the same job
Most teams need both. Figma for the design work; Vibe for the prototype.
Artefact you ship to research
Vibe.WithGov
A working Prototype Kit project at a sandbox URLFigma
Linked Figma frames; click-through wireframesReal form behaviour
Vibe.WithGov
Server-side validation, error summaries, focus managementFigma
Not supportedFigma can simulate clicks between frames but not real form input or validation.
Keyboard navigation that mirrors a real service
Vibe.WithGov
SupportedFigma
Not supportedGOV.UK Frontend (the real CSS + JS)
Vibe.WithGov
SupportedFigma
GOV.UK Design System components in FigmaFigma uses static design-system components; Vibe uses the published Frontend that production services run on.
Authoring surface
Vibe.WithGov
Plain-language spec + chatFigma
Drag-and-drop on a canvasBest for early shaping
Vibe.WithGov
Not supportedFigma
SupportedFigma is unbeatable for sketching the journey, exploring layout, and team critique.
Best for research-ready prototypes
Vibe.WithGov
SupportedFigma
Not supportedIteration speed within a sprint
Vibe.WithGov
Regenerate from spec edits in secondsFigma
Edit frames manually
WCAG 2.1 AA on first paint
Vibe.WithGov
SupportedFigma
Not supportedFigma wireframes are visual mocks; they have no accessibility tree to assess.
Keyboard and screen-reader testable
Vibe.WithGov
SupportedFigma
Not supportedUseful evidence for an assessment panel
Vibe.WithGov
Run axe-core against the live prototypeFigma
Verbal description only
Shareable URL for research participants
Vibe.WithGov
Per-project sandbox URLFigma
Figma prototype link (read-only)Participants type into the prototype
Vibe.WithGov
SupportedFigma
Not supportedHand to engineering as build spec
Vibe.WithGov
Working code, exportable as a Prototype Kit projectFigma
Visual reference only
Pricing model
Vibe.WithGov
Free tier; paid plans from £19/moFigma
Per-seat subscriptionUseful for the same job
Vibe.WithGov
Research-ready prototypesFigma
Wireframes, design system, team thinking spaceMost teams need both. Figma for the design work; Vibe for the prototype.
When Figma is the right call
- You’re sketching the journey shape and don’t yet know what the pages need to do.
- The team is critiquing layout, hierarchy and visual decisions that need to be argued over a canvas.
- You need to communicate the design intent to stakeholders who won’t click a prototype but will look at a frame.
- You’re building or maintaining the team’s component library and design tokens.
When Vibe is the right call
- The journey is shaped enough that you’re ready to test it with users.
- You need form validation, error summaries and real keyboard behaviour for accessibility testing.
- Research participants need to type, choose, submit, and feel the response of a real service.
- You want the artefact to double as a build spec for engineering, not just a visual reference.
Using them together
The pattern most teams settle on:
- Sketch the journey in Figma. Whiteboard-level fidelity is fine.
- Write a plain-language spec from the Figma frames (see the workflow guide).
- Generate the working prototype in Vibe. Walk it. Fix the ambiguities in the spec, regenerate.
- Put the Vibe URL in front of research participants. Bring findings back to both the Figma file and the spec.
- At alpha handoff, the Vibe export plus the Figma design history together form the build spec.
Vibe.WithGov is an independent product, not affiliated with Figma or the Government Digital Service. See the FAQ for more.
Related
- From Figma to a working GOV.UK prototype
The shortest path from Figma wireframes to a clickable Prototype Kit project.
- GOV.UK Prototype Kit vs Vibe.WithGov
How Vibe and the GDS-published Kit compare.
- GOV.UK form patterns
The components Vibe generates, when to use which, what the validation should read.
- Pricing
Free tier; paid plans from £19/mo.